|
In regard to fighting pathogens with nontraditional strategies, there are several non-antibiotic therapies that may offer much value in a modern world where
our advanced antibiotics are becoming more and more ineffective against even the common microorganisms that have mutated. In my racing and training past, my horses' lethal experiences with infections were not
helped by the antibiotics my vets offered as their top of the line
defense measures. They might as well have been injecting water. They were useless and my horses died any way. I have been much disillusioned with how modern veterinary medicine can fight infections that have gone systemic or that attack young animals with compromised immune systems. As long as an animal has a sound operating immune system and is neither too young or old and the infection has not gone systemic, most of the time our synthetic antibiotics seem worthwhile. Go out of that perimeter and you better watch out!
I have long been intrigued by the innovative work of two physicians of the early and mid 20th century with Dilute Hydrochloric acid. They were Burr Ferguson, MD and Walter B. Guy, MD They
each have authored books on the subject. Also an excellent compilation of the work of these two gentlemen by Henry Pleasants, Jr., MD of articles appearing in The Medical World
(1935) has proven a wonderful resource for this subject. For those of you unfamiliar with Dilute Hydrochloric acid, I plan to go into great detail on its subject in my book, but will only relate here a brief synopsis on how it came about, what it can do, and my experiences with it in treating a goat that had amputated its lower digit from a fence accident and a calf that had sustained unresponsive bovine pneumonia and frostbite.
Dr. Ferguson discovered that injecting dilute solutions of Hydrochloric acid could result in many infections being overcome resulting in successful recovery. This was back in the day when our
modern antibiotics were yet to be discovered. Penicillin only came onto the scene around 1940. Ferguson and Guy were doing their work in the 1930s and earlier. Dr.Ferguson is an interesting chap and to understand how he
developed this therapy is informative. While working with mercury and arsenic compounds around 1913 as injectable substances in the form of salicylate of mercury and Salvarsan, Ferguson discovered that both were
extremely effective against skin infections. Before I lose you on this one, note that the use of mercury and arsenic were very common during this time period, though very much detested by many people because of
accompanying side-effects. Needless to say, modern practitioners are shocked that mercury or arsenic were ever employed, but it cannot be denied that these two toxic compounds did cure in many conditions. The thing was,
both of these substances had never been given as injectables until just recently in Dr. Ferguson's career. He started injecting salicylate and curing patients. Healings were promptly stimulated by these
injections. He later practiced in the US Army during WW1. Though he was assigned to an administrative military office, he occasionally treated stubborn skin infections successfully with injectable salicylate.
After being demobilized in 1919, he joined the American Red Cross for work in Siberia. He again found many opportunities to use his injectable salicylate on slow healing wounds after amputations, furunculoisis and
unknown infections--all with surprising results as he writes. Later he was ordered to Albania to investigate a malaria epidemic. Once there, he treated specific malaria cases with injectable saliyclate and this time
also Salvarsan. He felt that his treated malaria cases when compared to traditional treatment with quinine, cured faster and was superior. He wrote: "There appeared to be no reason for such results but I felt that
there was some unusual explanation that my mind was not yet able to grasp." In 1923, a U.S. Consul in England was suffering from an infection of his axilla glands which would not heal
after five weeks of treatment. Dr. Ferguson was called in and immediately resorted to his tried and true salicylate injection resulting in the infectious lesions immediately responding. The dressings were thrown away
the next day! Finally, upon consultation with another physician on the mystery of why salicylate seemed so effective, Dr. Joe Doyle came up with the possibility that salicylate injections stimulated the white
blood cells resulting in the relatively new concept of immune response of phagocytosis, the engulfing of microbes by phagocytes. Dr. Ferguson immediately took this insight and started experimenting with blood counts
and injections. In cooperation with a pathologist, he injected himself with salicylate mercury. Ferguson's white blood cell count before the injection was 9000. Twenty four hours later another wbc count was
completed which showed 18,600. Other similar experiments were completed with volunteers with exactly the same results of increases in white blood cells. Further more, Ferguson discovered that white blood cell
stimulation was not just limited to salicylate, but injected novarsenobillion, quinine, bismuth, milk and plain old distilled water all stimulated the white blood cell count upon injection. Rightly or wrongly, Dr.
Ferguson concluded that "...all injected agents derived their powers from a stimulation of natural defensive forces of the body."
Certainly, this was an outlandish conclusion for the times and even today, but there may be some truth to this! The power of doubling the white blood cell numbers should not be overlooked, even in these modern times!
Shortly after this work, Dr. Ferguson happened to run across a used copy of Metchnikof's Immunity in Infective Diseases
in an old book shop in Rotterdam. This text offered Ferguson the scientific proof that he was on the right track. He was elated and in 1923, he journeyed to the Public Health Service in Washington DC with news of his discovery. He was told in no uncertain terms that his ideas were too revolutionary and that more tests were needed, at least 10,000 cases. Ferguson was disappointed in this reception. He also found resistance to his new
discovery
back in England. The prevailing thought was that antibodies were the prime immune reaction to fighting infections, not the white blood cells. It was felt that increased white blood cell numbers were only an indication of infective disease being present, nothing much more. It had been proven during this time period that both Mercury salicylate and arsenic were not specific germicidals for syphilis alone, yet both seemed to benefit a recovery in this disease. The problem was, no lethal effect on bacteria could be shown in the blood stream by mere contact with mercury or arsenic. Also, Metchnikof proved over 25 years previously that a culture medium containing anthrax, cholera and other similar harmful organisms were not affected by accepted toxic substances like mercury or arsenic. One can only conclude that it was the increase in white blood cells from the body's immune system that was the effective determinant to fighting infection, particularly in the affect of mercury or arsenic on syphilis and not a germicidal affect.
In 1926, Ferguson started treating gonorrhea at the Hillman Hospital. All cases coming to the clinic were treated solely with injectables to stimulate the white blood cell counts. 350
cases were treated with excellent results. Of these 350, one third were acute and cleared up in 5-6 weeks. Most of the chronic infections with histories of 6 months to over 5 years cleared up after about 40 injections.
A 1% Mercurochrome solution was being injected at around 8-15cc with good results but the white blood cell count was not maintained as well after its use as with arsphenamine. Also, white blood cells were stimulated
with intramuscular injections of salicylate and bismuth. During this period of using mercurochrome and arsphenamine, Ferguson saw too many reactions in his patients to make him happy with their continued use. By chance,
he received a card in the mail announcing a lecture by a Dr. Granville Hanes on his new treatment for pruritus ani, and he attended that meeting. Dr. Hanes lectured how he injected Hydrochloric acid at 1:3000 dilution
under the lesions of this anal infection for very consistent good results. Dr. Ferguson experienced one of those Eureka moments! Hydrochloric acid was the substance he had been looking for all of these years! Ferguson
knew that Hanes was stimulating the white blood cell count resulting in his successes. Dr. Hanes had attributed the use of HCL to some unknown factor of the acid. Ferguson immediately took this knowledge back to the lab
and found that Hydrochloric acid injected at 1:1500 in 10 cc doses, intramuscularly, produced a white blood cell increase of 2500-3500 in one hour. He felt that Hydrochloric acid was completely safe with no
contraindications. After all, it was a naturally synthesized body acid produced in the stomach. He immediately started further testing. He quickly determined that the problem with
intramuscular Hydrochloric acid injections was the pain for the patient. Dr. Ferguson decided that there was no reason why this HCL solution could not be given directly into the vein and he injected himself and two
others. He quickly found that an intravenous injection did no harm, nor was there any reaction and it was painless. Thus, began his years of clinical practice with injectable Hydrochloric acid in various strengths,
mostly 1:2000 to 1:500 at 10 to 25cc amounts. It has proven uncannily effective against all sorts of infections, severe pneumonias, septicemias, malaria, typhoid fever, pain relief, tetanus, smallpox,
venomous bites, anthrax, and some cancers. For more detailed case studies, one should study their books. I won't go further into Ferguson's successes. I first tried dilute hydrochloric
acid injections on a young goat that had decapitated a front hoof in a fence accident several years ago. I mainly wanted to see if HCL could keep the amputated digit free of infection and how the goat tolerated HCL
injections both IV and IM. I treated the animal for approximately two weeks in a dirty barn environment and found the amputated limb to be surprisingly infection-free throughout. The nanny was soon sold to market which
ceased my experimentation of this particular subject. This nanny showed no ill effect from intravenous injections of 1:2000 dilution of Hydrochloric acid in dosages up to 10cc. I did a few intramuscular injections and
as I suspected, the goat showed symptoms that this route was rather painful, stinging. If I planned to do many IM injections, I would mix the dilute HCL with a local anesthetic as recommended by Dr. Ferguson in his text
for a more humane administration. It could also be given subq (subcutaneous). My second subject was a beef type calf which was dropped during a snow storm on Feb. 28, 2009 to a mother
that was "dry". He was soon taken off the old cow and bottle fed with frozen colostrum and formula. He soon developed pneumonia with fever and labored breathing, characterized by thick mucus exudate from both nostrils.
Initially, the broad spectrum antibiotic, Baytril© was injected with improvement. Two weeks went by with the calf again developing pneumonia. When I saw him, Baytril had just been given a second
time and he was laying in the sun, head and neck extended forward on the ground with labored breathing. He would curiously open his mouth every 10 seconds or so in an opening and shutting motion. Edema was seen in all
four ankles with the left hind the most severe. His temperature was taken which showed 106 degrees. To the best of my experiences of the past, this calf showed all indications of being close to death. There was no
improvement 3 days after the second round of Baytril. He did exhibit a strong appetite and sucked his bottle well which was encouraging. |
|
|
Conclusions / Outcome It has been approximately 72 days since this calf was dropped
in the snow on February 28th and he is still flourishing with a good appetite. After overcoming two serious bouts with pneumonia—no doubt partly a response to inadequate colostrum intake, his lower left hind digit
auto-amputated as expected from frostbite complications. Note that my nephew (calf's owner) did not want to put this calf down despite the amputation, because he felt that the calf showed no indications of being in
undue pain, nor was it lacking in a robust appetite for the milk replacer. We decided to carry on and see if nature could enact a cure with us helping to stimulate her in the proper direction. Ideally, this calf should
have been taken to the vet for a high surgical amputation with a proper closing of the stub with a flap of skin. For economic reasons, my nephew was unwilling to do this. I, being a student of wild health, knew
that many times, wild animals seemed to heal remarkably well out in the wild, away from man, presuming they can keep away from predators. I wanted to see how Mother Nature would perform on this calf plus I wanted
another subject for further dilute Hydrochloric acid study. I have continually treated this calf throughout this period with dilute Hydrochloric acid
injections primarily intravenously and at a dilution of 1:500. So far, I have given over 24 separate HCL injections. To the best of my experience, I am certain we would have lost this calf after it succumbed to
pneumonia a second time on March 14th had it not been for dilute HCL injections initiated on the 16th. Baytril given on the 14th did not seem effective for this second infection but, then, was only given once. Anal
temperatures of 106 continued to be maintained 3 days after Bayril with no lessening of lung distress. I initiated HCL on the 16th. The first week of dilute hydrochloric acid injections protocol was every day
during his pneumonia phase. His pneumonia symptoms seemed to quickly abate in days with improvement being seen each day. The following week, I went to an every other day regime for the next two weeks. Lung distress and
lung infection symptoms disappeared plus the amputated wound showed no signs of infection. During the week of April 12th, I lengthened the HCL injections out every third day with this being implemented until
May 6th primarily to guard against gangrene or sepsis from the amputated digit. During this time, I was also applying a DMSO/turmeric paste to the bottom of the stub and dressing it in fresh aloe vera
syrup & comfrey root paste to try to maintain a wet healing environment without causing epidermal saturation and destruction. The stub's wound to this date seemed to show healthy angiogenesis and granulation.
So far, I am very enthusiastic about the potential value and safety of Dilute Hydrochloric acid therapy! Not only was it a life saver for the
above calf, but it seemed equally valuable upon my previous goat patient. I regret not having it in my pharmaceutical arsenal for my equine patients that succumbed to infections in my past career. I think that Dr.
Ferguson and Dr. Guy were on to something, and dilute Hydrochloric acid was prematurely put into its grave only by the new discovery of penicillin and accompanying later modern antibiotics. I feel that dilute
Hydrochloric acid can fight many infections wonderfully while at the same time avoiding the side-effects often seen in antibiotic therapy. I saw no evidence that this calf's GI tract was the least bit altered by HCL
use. I am afraid; I could not say the same for the common antibiotics. Not only did HCL seem to quickly stop a lung infection (probably a biofilm), it maintained the tissue health of an unclosed wound in a dirty barn
environment. May the value of Dilute Hydrochloric acid come once again to the forefront! I will continue testing. |
|